← All articles

Architecture Icons · 04 Oct 2026 · 31 min read

Sidi Saiyyed Mosque Jaali, Ahmedabad: The Tree of Life Explained

Sidi Saiyyed Mosque Jaali, Ahmedabad: The Tree of Life Explained — cover

In the old walled city of Ahmedabad, a short walk from Lal Darwaja and the traffic of Relief Road, stands a modest sandstone mosque that most visitors could pass in a minute. It has no towering minarets and no grand courtyard. What stops people is a window: a pointed stone arch filled with a carving of intertwined trees, their branches curling into tendrils, a palm rising at the centre, the whole thing cut so finely that the stone reads as lace against the light. This is the Sidi Saiyyed jaali, and for many people in India it is the single image that stands for Ahmedabad.

The window is reproduced everywhere — on the logo of the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, on souvenirs and city branding, and, increasingly, on CNC-cut pooja doors, headboards and living-room partitions in homes far from Gujarat. Most of those copies miss what makes the original work. They trace the outline of the trees but lose the structure underneath: the way the trunk and the palm carry the composition, the way the openings are spread evenly so the light falls softly, and the way the carving's thickness and bridge widths suit stone. A tree of life cut in thin MDF with hairline branches looks impressive on a screen and snaps within a year.

This article looks closely at one monument rather than the jaali tradition as a whole, which is covered in this blog's broader history of the Indian jaali. It sets out what is reliably known about the mosque, reads the tree-of-life composition piece by piece, explains why a stone screen of this kind controls light and privacy so well, and turns those lessons into dimensions, materials and rules for anyone who wants a tree-of-life jaali in a modern interior.

The mosque in its time: Ahmedabad at the end of the Sultanate

Ahmedabad was founded in 1411 by Sultan Ahmad Shah I of the Gujarat Sultanate, on the east bank of the Sabarmati. Over the next century and a half the Sultans and their nobles filled the city with mosques, tombs and stepwells built in the yellow sandstone of the region, and they did it with a particular kind of craftsmanship. Gujarat already had one of the strongest stone-carving cultures in India, refined over centuries of temple building in the Solanki tradition. Sultanate builders drew on those same carvers. The result, visible in the Jama Masjid of 1424 and in dozens of smaller buildings, is an architecture that uses the arches and plans of mosque design but is dense with the carved columns, brackets, niches and foliage of the region's temple workshops.

The Sidi Saiyyed Mosque belongs to the very end of that story. It was completed in 1572–73, the years in which the Mughal emperor Akbar brought Gujarat into his empire and the independent Sultanate came to an end. Its builder, according to the standard accounts, was Sidi Saiyyed, an Abyssinian (Habshi) nobleman in the service of the Sultanate's later court. Gujarat's ports had long-standing links with the Horn of Africa, and men of African descent rose to high military and court positions in the Sultanate; the mosque is one of the most visible reminders of that history. Because it was built so late, and so close to the political upheaval of the conquest, the mosque is often described as unfinished — the most commonly cited sign being an arch in the rear wall that is filled with plain stone where a carved screen might have been expected.

In plan, the mosque is small and simple: an arcaded prayer hall, open on its east side, with its back wall facing west towards Mecca. That back wall and the side walls are where the screens are. The rear wall carries pierced stone panels — most in geometric designs of squares and stars — and in the arches on either side of the central bay sit the two famous screens carved with trees and foliage. One of them, with its tangle of curving branches around a central palm, is the image the world knows as the Sidi Saiyyed jaali.

Fig. 1 — Six dates that frame the Sidi Saiyyed jaali 1411Ahmad Shah Ifounds the city 1424Jama Masjidcompleted 1572–73Sidi SaiyyedMosque built 1572–73Akbar takesGujarat 1961IIM Ahmedabadset up; jaali logo 2017UNESCO WorldHeritage City The mosque was finished in the same years that the Gujarat Sultanate ended — it marks the close of Sultanate building in Ahmedabad, and tradition links its one plain, unscreened rear arch to that upheaval. Icons are schematic. The IIM Ahmedabad logo is an adaptation of the tree-of-life screen.
Fig. 1 — Ahmedabad and the Sidi Saiyyed jaali: a timeline from 1411 to today
FactWhat is reliably knownHow confident
LocationNear Lal Darwaja, inside the old walled city of AhmedabadCertain — a well-known landmark
DateCompleted 1572–73 (AH 980), at the end of the Gujarat SultanateStandard date in heritage accounts
BuilderSidi Saiyyed, an Abyssinian (Habshi) noble of the Sultanate periodStandard account; personal details vary by source
MaterialYellow sandstone, like most Sultanate buildings in the cityVisible on site
PlanArcaded prayer hall, open to the east, rear (qibla) wall to the westVisible on site
The screensPierced stone panels in the rear and side arches; two carved with trees and foliageVisible on site; counts differ slightly by source
Unfinished lookOne rear arch filled with plain stone instead of a screenVisible; the reason is traditionally linked to the Mughal conquest
Status todayActive mosque within the Historic City of Ahmedabad World Heritage property (2017)UNESCO listing is certain

The table separates what can be stated firmly from what is tradition. Heritage writing about the mosque sometimes adds colourful detail — exact counts of craftsmen, the name of a designer, the precise size of each screen — that is not well documented. Where this article gives dimensions, they are for modern reproductions, not measured figures from the monument, and the drawings of the mosque are schematic.

Reading the tree of life: how the composition is built

The famous screen fills the upper part of a pointed arch. At first glance it looks like a free, almost wild drawing of trees. Look longer and a clear structure appears, the same structure a designer needs to understand before redrawing it for a modern panel. There is a central vertical axis — a slender trunk that rises to a palm-like crown. On either side, larger trees grow from the base and lean outwards, their main branches sweeping up and then curling back inwards. From those branches come secondary branches, and from them a dense web of tendrils and leaves that fills every remaining space. The composition is close to mirror-symmetrical about the centre but not mechanically so; small differences between the two halves keep it alive.

Three design ideas hold it together. First, hierarchy: the trunk and the main branches are visibly thicker than the tendrils, so the eye reads the big shapes from across a room and discovers the fine detail only up close. Second, even distribution of openings: there are no large blank areas and no large holes, so light comes through as hundreds of small, similar patches rather than a few bright ones. Third, containment: everything grows within the arch, and the outer branches follow its curve, so the frame and the carving read as one object. A modern copy that keeps the outline of the trees but loses these three ideas is a picture of the Sidi Saiyyed jaali, not a working version of it.

Fig. 2 — Rear (west) wall, seen from inside the prayer hall — schematic geometricscreen tree-of-lifescreen central archfilled with stone tree-of-lifescreen geometricscreen mihrab axis Schematic only — not drawn from a survey; the number of bays and screen shapes are simplified. The carved screens fill the upper, arched part of each opening; the lower part is a solid or open wall zone.
Fig. 2 — The rear wall of the prayer hall in elevation: where the tree-of-life screens sit (schematic)
Element of the compositionWhat it looks likeThe design job it doesKeep in a modern copy?
Arch framePointed arch that contains the carvingGives a hard edge so the organic pattern does not look unfinishedYes — even in a rectangular panel, keep a border
Central trunk and palmSlender vertical stem rising to a fan of frondsSets the axis of symmetry and the focal pointYes — it is the visual anchor
Main treesTwo larger trees rising from the base and leaning outwardFill the width and carry most of the weight of the imageYes — keep them visibly thicker than the detail
Primary branchesLong curves sweeping up and curling inwardEcho the arch and tie the trees to the frameYes — they also act as structural ribs
Tendrils and leavesDense small curls filling every gapSpread the openings evenly; turn glare into dappled lightSimplify — scale them to the material's minimum bridge
BaseGround line or mound from which the trees growStabilises the composition visuallyYes — and give it a solid strip for strength
AsymmetriesSmall differences between left and rightStop the carving looking mechanicalOptional — CNC copies often mirror exactly

Why the screen works: light, depth and privacy

A carved stone screen does not behave like a printed pattern on glass. Its openings have depth. When the low morning or late-afternoon sun strikes the screen at an angle, the sides of each opening catch some of the light and throw it back, so the light entering the room is softened and the glare of the sky is broken into many small, warm patches. Seen from inside against a bright exterior, the stone becomes a dark silhouette and the tree shapes glow at their edges. This is the view in most photographs of the Sidi Saiyyed jaali, and it depends on two things that thin modern copies often lack: enough thickness for the openings to have sides, and a dark-enough room behind the viewer for the contrast to read.

The same depth gives privacy. As explained in the broader jaali article, privacy through a screen depends on the brightness difference between its two sides: a person on the bright side sees the lit surface of the stone, not the dimmer interior behind it, while a person inside looks out with ease. A deeper screen narrows the angle through which anyone outside can see in, so even at moderate openness the interior stays private except from directly in front. The tree-of-life design adds a further effect: because the openings are irregular and curving rather than in straight rows, the eye cannot easily line them up to read a clear view through. That is a quality any designer of a privacy screen should borrow.

Fig. 3 — Deep screen vs thin copy, in section (enlarged, schematic) A — Stone screen, 50 mm deep B — Board copy, 12 mm deep 5012 opening 40 low sunlow sun Angled sun hits the sides of each opening: glare is broken up; oblique views are blocked. Sun passes almost straight through; people outside can see in at wide angles. wide view angle narrow
Fig. 3 — Section through a deep stone screen and a thin board copy: why depth controls glare and view (mm)

Fig. 3 explains why a convincing tree-of-life screen needs depth as well as detail. With openings about as wide as the screen is deep, angled sunlight strikes the sides of the openings and oblique views are cut off; with a thin board, both pass straight through. This is not an argument for using only stone. A 12 mm MDF screen can be given visual depth by backing it with a second, offset layer, by setting it in a deep frame, or by choosing 18–25 mm board and a slightly coarser pattern. What it argues against is the commonest modern mistake: a highly detailed tree drawn with hairline branches and cut in the thinnest board that will go through the machine.

The craft: carving a stone tree of life

Large stone screens of the Sultanate period were cut from sandstone slabs by hand. The broad method is well understood even where the specific workshop is not documented. The design was drawn full size and transferred to the dressed face of the slab. Carvers then drilled and chiselled through the openings, working from both faces so the stone did not spall where the tool broke through, and finally modelled the surface of the branches and leaves so that they read as rounded forms rather than flat strips. Big compositions were usually assembled from more than one slab fitted into the frame of the arch, with joints placed along branch lines where they would be least visible.

Two practical facts about stone shaped the design. First, sandstone is strong in compression but weak in tension, so a long thin branch spanning across a gap is fragile; the carvers kept connections short and frequent, with tendrils touching the next branch or the frame every few centimetres. Second, every branch also had to work as structure. In the Sidi Saiyyed screen the decorative tree and the load path are the same thing — the trunk and main branches carry the panel, the tendrils brace it. Modern CNC reproductions need exactly the same thinking, expressed as a minimum bridge width for the chosen material.

AspectSidi Saiyyed tree-of-life screenMughal marble geometric screen (e.g. Fatehpur Sikri, Agra)Lesson for a modern designer
Pattern typeOrganic: trees, palm, foliageGeometric: stars, hexagons, interlaced polygonsOrganic patterns can filter light as well as geometric ones if openings are even
MaterialYellow sandstoneWhite marbleMaterial colour changes the mood of the light — warm vs cool
Scale of detailFine tendrils within large tree formsRepeating module, often 50–300 mmOrganic designs need a clear hierarchy of thick and thin
RepeatOne composition per arch, near-symmetricalPattern repeats across the whole screenA single composition must be sized to its frame, not tiled
StructureTrunk and branches carry the loadThe grid of bars carries the loadThicken the structural lines first, then add detail
Best modern useFeature panel: pooja door, headboard, single archLong partitions, facades, railingsChoose organic for a focal point, geometric for long runs

From monument to emblem: the jaali in Ahmedabad's identity

By the twentieth century the tree-of-life screen had become shorthand for the city. When the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad was set up in 1961, it adopted a stylised version of the screen as its emblem, and it has stayed with the institute ever since. The image now appears on city heritage material, on hotel interiors and handicrafts, and on countless CNC panels sold as "Sidi Saiyyed design". That popularity has a cost: a motif that once belonged to one building becomes generic, and the copies drift further from the original with each generation of redrawing.

The renewed attention also has a positive side. In 2017 UNESCO inscribed the Historic City of Ahmedabad on the World Heritage List — the first Indian city to be listed as a whole — recognising the walled city's Sultanate monuments together with its pols, the dense neighbourhoods of carved wooden houses. The Sidi Saiyyed Mosque sits inside that historic city, and the listing has brought more structured heritage walks, signage and conservation attention to the area. For designers, the lesson is that the screen is part of a living urban fabric, not an isolated pattern to download.

Adapting the tree of life today: sizes and layouts

A tree-of-life jaali in a home is almost always a feature, not a partition run. It works best where a single panel can be seen as a whole: a pooja unit door pair, a backlit panel behind a bed, a single arch in a foyer, the upper part of a door between living and dining, or one bay of a facade screen. Because it is one composition rather than a repeating module, the panel must be drawn to fit its frame. Stretching a downloaded file to a different proportion distorts the trees, and tiling it side by side breaks the symmetry that gives the design its calm.

The safest proportions are close to the original's tall arch: roughly 2:3 to 1:2 width to height. A 1200 × 1800 mm panel, or a pair of 600 × 1800 mm pooja doors that read as one composition when closed, keeps the trees upright and lets the branches follow the curve of an arched top. For wider openings, the better move is a central tree-of-life panel flanked by simple geometric or plain slatted panels, exactly as the mosque itself sets its two carved screens among geometric ones.

Fig. 4 — Feature panel 1200 × 1800 mm, arched head (1 m = 200 px) 1200 1800 1300 Hierarchy of widths (18 mm MDF/HDHMR) Border frame: 100 mm all round Base strip: 100 mm solid Trunk and main trees: 40–50 mm Primary branches: 30 mm Tendrils: ≥ 25 mm (≥ 1.5 × board) Smallest opening: ≈ 15–20 mm Same panel in 3 mm mild steel Tendrils can drop to 4–6 mm; detail close to the stone original. Same panel in 30 mm sandstone Bridges ≈ 20–30 mm; panel weighs roughly 90–110 kg. Draw the trunk and main trees first as structure, then fill with tendrils sized to the material — never the other way round.
Fig. 4 — A tree-of-life panel redrawn for CNC: 1200 × 1800 mm with structural hierarchy (mm)
UseTypical size (mm)Recommended materialOpenness targetNotes
Pooja unit door pair2 × 450–600 wide, 1500–2100 high18 mm MDF or HDHMR, PU or duco20–35 %Backlight 50–100 mm behind for a glowing tree
Headboard feature1500–1800 wide × 900–1200 high12–18 mm MDF with 18 mm backing frame25–40 %Fix to wall on battens; warm LED behind
Foyer arch900–1200 wide × 2100–2400 high18 mm HDHMR or 3 mm MS30–45 %Arched head echoes the original
Upper door panel750–900 wide × 600–900 high12 mm MDF or 2 mm MS30–40 %Keep lower door solid for strength
Facade bay1200–1500 wide × 2400–3000 high3–4 mm aluminium or GFRC35–50 %Coarsen the pattern for viewing from the street
Garden or courtyard screen1000–1500 wide × 1800–2400 highSandstone or GFRC30–45 %Structural check for weight; footing or slab fixing

Materials and cost for a tree-of-life jaali

The fineness of the tendrils decides which material can reproduce the design. Metal cut by laser or waterjet keeps the closest detail because its minimum bridge is about equal to its thickness. Boards cut by CNC router need bridges of about one-and-a-half times their thickness, and the router bit leaves a radius in every inside corner, so tendrils must be simplified and slightly thickened. Stone and GFRC can be modelled in depth — the branches rounded rather than flat — which is the only way to get close to the original's carved surface. The costs below are the same indicative October 2026 ranges used in this blog's jaali history article, for finished, installed panels per square foot; an organic tree-of-life file usually sits in the upper half of each range because it takes longer to cut and finish than a simple geometric repeat.

MaterialThicknessMinimum practical bridgeDetail fidelity to the originalIndicative installed cost (₹/sq ft)
MDF, CNC routed, PU or duco12–18 mm≈ 18–25 mmMedium — tendrils simplified₹350–800
HDHMR, CNC routed, painted12–18 mm≈ 18–25 mmMedium₹450–950
Mild steel, laser cut, powder coated2–6 mm≈ thicknessHigh — fine tendrils possible₹450–1,000
Stainless steel, PVD gold1.2–3 mm≈ thicknessHigh; strong glow when backlit₹1,200–3,500
Aluminium, laser cut3–4 mm≈ thicknessHigh; good for facades₹550–1,200
GFRC, moulded15–30 mm≈ 25–40 mmMedium; can be modelled in relief₹700–1,600
Sandstone or marble, CNC plus hand finish25–50 mm≈ 20–30 mmHighest — true carved depth₹1,500–6,000+

Two further costs are often forgotten. The design file itself — redrawing a tree of life properly for a given size and material, with a structural hierarchy and bridges checked — takes skilled drafting time, and a cheap downloaded file almost always needs this work anyway. And a backlit panel needs a lighting cavity, an LED strip with a diffuser and a driver, which adds a modest amount per running foot. For a 1200 × 1800 mm panel of about 23 sq ft in painted HDHMR, the panel alone falls in the region of ₹10,000–22,000 at the ranges above, before backlighting and the frame it sits in.

Fig. 5 — Plan section of a pooja unit with a jaali door (1 mm = 0.5 px) masonry wall LED strip in aluminium profile, warm white 2700–3000 K idol shelf and storage zone, 350–450 deep shelf front gap 50–100 to door ≈ 400 1200 overall — two 600 jaali doors (18 mm) Light the back panel, not the door: the tree reads as a dark silhouette on a glowing field, like the original against the sky.
Fig. 5 — Backlit tree-of-life pooja door: section through door, cavity and back panel (mm)

Fig. 5 shows the one lighting decision that makes a tree-of-life panel look like the mosque rather than a cut-out. The light source is placed at the back of the unit and washes a pale back panel, so the jaali is seen in silhouette against an evenly glowing surface — the same relationship as the stone screen against a bright sky. Lighting the front of the jaali, or placing the LED strip directly behind the openings, produces hot spots and visible dots, and flattens the carving.

Where the tree-of-life motif is going

The motif's future is being shaped by the same tools that are reshaping the jaali in general. Parametric software can vary the size of openings across a panel, so a tree-of-life screen can be denser where privacy is needed and more open where a view or breeze is wanted, without losing the drawing. Five-axis CNC machines can carve stone and solid wood in relief rather than simply cutting through a flat sheet, bringing back some of the rounded modelling of the original branches. Laser-cut metal with a PVD finish allows a level of fineness close to the stone carving at a fraction of its weight. At the same time, heritage practice is moving towards documentation and careful conservation of the original screens, so that copies can be measured against a reliable record rather than against earlier copies.

The risk is over-use. As the image spreads to every kind of product, it can lose its meaning and become a generic "ethnic" pattern. Designers who use it well will do what the mosque does: use it sparingly, as a single focal composition set among quieter elements, in a material and thickness that respect its structure. Aaditya Interior's approach on projects is to treat a tree-of-life panel as one carefully drawn piece of the room, not a texture applied to every surface.

Rules for using a tree-of-life jaali well

  • Use it once per room as a focal panel; set it among plain or geometric elements, as the mosque does.
  • Redraw the composition to the exact frame size and proportion — never stretch or tile a downloaded file.
  • Draw the structure first: border 75–100 mm, trunk and main trees 40–50 mm, branches about 30 mm in 18 mm board.
  • Keep every tendril above the material's minimum bridge: about 1.5 × board thickness for MDF or HDHMR, about 1 × thickness for metal.
  • Prefer a tall proportion of about 2:3 to 1:2, ideally with an arched or framed head that contains the branches.
  • Give the screen depth — 18–25 mm board, a deep frame or a second offset layer — if it must control glare or views.
  • Backlight the panel behind it, 50–100 mm away, with warm white light; do not light the jaali from the front.
  • Ask for a cutting preview at full size, or a test piece, before the full panel is cut.

Frequently asked questions

Who built the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque?

Standard accounts credit Sidi Saiyyed, an Abyssinian (Habshi) noble in the service of the Gujarat Sultanate's later court. The mosque was completed in 1572–73, in the same years that Akbar annexed Gujarat to the Mughal empire.

Why is the Sidi Saiyyed jaali called the tree of life?

Because its carving shows intertwined trees growing from a common base around a central palm, with branches and tendrils filling the arch. The tree of life is a widespread symbol across many cultures, and the name has been attached to this screen in popular and heritage writing; the carving itself shows trees and foliage rather than an inscription explaining its meaning.

Is the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque a UNESCO World Heritage Site?

It lies within the Historic City of Ahmedabad, which UNESCO inscribed on the World Heritage List in 2017. The listing covers the walled city as a whole, including its Sultanate-period monuments and its pol neighbourhoods.

Can the tree-of-life jaali be made in MDF for a pooja door?

Yes, and it is one of the most popular uses. Use 18 mm MDF or HDHMR with PU or duco paint, simplify the tendrils so that no bridge is thinner than about 25 mm, keep a 75–100 mm solid border, and backlight the panel behind it. For finer detail closer to the stone original, use 2–3 mm laser-cut mild steel with a powder coat.

Why does the central arch of the mosque have no jaali?

One arch of the rear wall is filled with plain stone. It is traditionally explained as a sign that the mosque was not finished before the Mughal conquest of Gujarat; this is the commonly given explanation rather than a documented fact.

Where is the IIM Ahmedabad logo from?

The Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, set up in 1961, uses a stylised version of the Sidi Saiyyed tree-of-life jaali as its emblem.

Sources & standards

  1. UNESCO World Heritage Centre — Historic City of Ahmedabad (inscribed 2017): official description and nomination documentation
  2. Archaeological Survey of India — monument notes for Sultanate-period Ahmedabad, including the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque
  3. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, Heritage Cell — heritage walk and walled-city documentation
  4. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad — institute emblem and its origin in the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque jaali
  5. Bureau of Indian Standards — IS 12406 (medium density fibreboard) and IS 2062 (structural steel) for modern reproductions
  6. Aaditya Interior — The Story of the Indian Jaali: History, Patterns, Sizes and Modern Uses (companion article for material ranges)
  7. Price ranges: indicative October 2026 estimates — confirm locally before budgeting
Discuss your project

Keep Reading

Related articles

All articles →
Angkor Wat: Planning and Symbolism in Stone — cover
Architecture Icons

Angkor Wat: Planning and Symbolism in Stone

Angkor Wat, built for the Khmer king Suryavarman II in the first half of the twelfth century, is a model of the Hindu cosmos in stone: a central tower for Mount Meru, four corner towers for its peaks, galleried walls for the mountain ranges and a moat about 190 m wide for the cosmic ocean. Its west-facing axis, slow processional approach and rising terraces still teach designers how sequence, water and scale shape experience.

Alhambra Granada: Courtyards, Water and Pattern — cover
Architecture Icons

Alhambra, Granada: Courtyards, Water and Pattern

The Alhambra is a hilltop palace-city in Granada, Spain, whose Nasrid palaces of the fourteenth century are built around two famous courtyards: the long reflecting pool of the Court of the Myrtles and the cross-shaped water channels of the Court of the Lions. Its lessons for Indian homes are practical — rooms arranged around a shaded court, small amounts of moving water, tile at the bottom of walls and pattern above, and light filtered through screens.

The Pantheon, Rome: The Dome That Still Stands — cover
Architecture Icons

The Pantheon, Rome: The Dome That Still Stands

The Pantheon's dome, completed under Emperor Hadrian around AD 125, spans about 43.3 m in unreinforced concrete and still stands because its shape keeps it in compression, its concrete gets lighter and thinner towards the top, and an open oculus of about 8–9 m removes the weakest part. Continuous use as a church since AD 609 kept it maintained.